Knowledge

Why does the natural world in Fallout look so damaged 200 years after the nuclear war?

Because Bethesda didn’t care to know how nuclear bombs work.

In real life, 200 years after a nuclear bomb detonation, it would look more like this:

or

and less like

The thing about radiation is that the rates of it deplete very quickly. Even if we had huge amounts of nukes dropped everywhere, 90% of the emitted radiation would be depleted after 7 hours. This means that if the level of radiation is at 1000 rads/hour, after 7 hours it would be 100 rads/hour. After another 7 hours, 10 rads/hour.

If we keep doing this, then after roughly 100 years, 94 to be precise, the radiation is harmless. It would only be 40% higher than current US background radiation.

Nukes aren’t so much instant XK class end-of-the-world bombs like so many people believe, but as General MacArthur put it “really big grenades”.

However, Bethesda wants to create a post-apocalyptic world with the premise of a nuclear fallout, so they can choose to ignore physics and do what they like because it’s a game.

Thanks to someone in the comments for reminding me about nuclear winters. If the nukes were widespread and powerful, then a nuclear winter could occur.

A nuclear winter would be caused by carbon particulates, produced by widespread fires, gathering in the air and blocking sunlight.

This may be a vastly bigger issue than the radiation fallout and could lead to a near extinction event. Though, as someone once said, “Life will, UHH, find a way”.

However, nuclear winter is still a hypothesis and has never actually been proven. For all we know, the smoke may never reach high enough until it is returned down to the ground as rain.

Related Posts

Why is there no heating problem during the launching of a spacecraft but there is during reentry?

Imagine the air is a wall. On launch, a rocket starts slow, it finds the door-It pushes through the thick air near the ground politely, and by the…

Aren’t AWACs very easy targets for enemy planes? Has this been tested in modern aerial warfare? They seem to be very slow planes.

A converted civilian airliner with huge radar on it flying a predictable racetrack pattern is pretty easy to shoot down—if you ever get in range. The problem is,…

Moon landing deniers show an image with a crosshair behind an object. How can this be explained by someone who doesn’t believe the conspiracy?

 The crosshair was etched into a glass plate called a Reseau plate in front of the photographic film. It allows examiners to see whether the film is warped,…

If a planet about 10 light years away from Earth had an all-out nuclear war (10 years ago), would we be able to detect it?

No. I’m not sure if this is still true or not, but a number of years ago, I heard from one astronomer who said “If there is an…

Did CERN create gold from lead?

Yes, but do not think of the alchemist’s dream – This was not about riches. In May of 2025, scientists at CERN confirmed it. When beams of lead ions are…

Why don’t tank crews just run over enemies instead of shooting them when they’re close by?

We do, but it doesn’t happen as often as you might think. [Above is a cutaway view of the Abrams driver’s compartment. Perfectly comfortable for man of average…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *