Knowledge

Why are ship engines so massive yet have so little horsepower?

You must be joking?

Some of the container ships and cruise ships have engines ranging from 60000 -100000 hp. That’s a massive engine with a lot of horsepower.

You need a massive engine weighing several hundreds of tonnes to produce that kind of horsepower and a 100000 hp engine is nothing to belittle at.

Ship engines produce LOTS of horsepower as in 100,000 Hp

However they are large and heavy for that power output compared to smaller engines

That is because they run for weeks at a time

The weight is much less of a problem with a ship

And for efficiency

Diesel engines work by spraying the diesel into the air – you need to get the molecules of diesel to meet up with their molecules of oxygen

This is done by “swirling” the air – and blasting the fuel in under high pressure

It takes a LOT more energy to “Swirl” the air (a gas) than it does to squirt the fuel

Diesels in vehicles used to use a “pre-chamber” to swirl the air and inject the fuel at about 400 Bar – when they went away from that they had to up the injection pressure past 1000 Bar – but they got close to 20% improvement in fuel efficiency

But even then “Direct Injection” engines swirl the air

That bowl you see makes the air swirl like a smoke ring so that the fuel and air can find each other

Very BIG diesels – like ship engines are “Quiescent” engines – they are designed NOT to swirl the air

The result is that you have to inject the fuel to meet the air – which limits the rpm – so you use low revs

But it makes the engine more efficient – so it burns less fuel

Low revs means you need a bigger engine for the same power

I’m going to emphasise that last point!!

Torque is (very roughly) proportional to size

Power = Torque x Rpm

So if you rev twice as fast you get twice the power from the same size engine

The huge ship engines run a LOT slower – as in about 1/20th the revs

So you need an engine 20 times as large to get the same power

I will add Paul Haas’s very good point – if the engine is close to prop speed then you need less or zero reduction to drive the prop.

Related Posts

Why was the aircraft carrier USS America CV-66 almost impossible to sink when it was used as a test target in 2005 while battleships with much thicker armor were routinely sunk in combat in WW2 using now-obsolete weapons?

The USS America is the only super carrier ever sunk, either on purpose or in combat. It took four weeks and they ended up having to scuttle her…

Are there dead bodies in Titanic?

There are some preserved bodies inside the bowels of the wreckage. The engineers that were trapped in the bottom are believed to had been preserved as they’re buried…

Can China destroy the American Navy fleet if they get into Chinese waters?

China can destroy any fleet anywhere in the world. Not only an American one. Not only near and around China, but anywhere. The idea that China has the…

Is it true that USS Eisenhower (docked for repairs in Souda Bay) hit and severely damaged by multiple Houthi ballistic missiles?

Yes, the Eisenhower was sunk. Fortunately close NATO ally the United Kingdom stepped in to help – you see the Argentines managed to sink HMS Invincible three times…

If a planet is 500 light years away, does that mean that even if you traveled at the speed of light, it would still take you 500 years to get there?

In Special Relativity, we are concerned with different frames and how they compare with each other. So the short answer is you could do it in under 500…

How did the US transport hundreds of fighter planes to Europe during WWII? Did they have the range to fly that far?

In 1942, as the British readied airfields for them, B-17 bombers and P-38 twin engine fighters would self deploy from the US to England. Neither aircraft had the…

error: Content is protected !!