World

What made Stukas effective in the Battle of Britain?

In the onset the Germans felt in control of the situation. They deployed Stuka dive bombers – loud and frightening aircraft built to frighten. These things did not simply drop bombs; they screamed on the way down. The sirens were deemed to scare people and they did so. British ships, airfields, radar stations – they took a beating. People were scared. Britain seemed to be in genuine trouble.

But fear doesn’t win battles.

And then there came the British fighter planes – the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Fast, sharp, ready to fight. The Stuka? It was slow. Bad at turning. After dropping its bombs it was more or less a sitting duck. British pilots took them down one after the other.

The Germany lost many Stukas in a few days. Too many. It stopped being worth the risk. They picked them out of the battle.

Well okay, the Stuka did come in strong, loud and dangerous. However it could not pace the fast battle. It wasn’t designed for the sort of fight that the British threw at it. And in a war if you fall behind you are out. The Battle of Britain did not wait for it. The Stuka never had any chance of a comeback.


The Stuka weighed almost four tons, and Britain was short of aluminium to make fighter aircraft.

Every Stuka that was shot down and crashed on British soil was extremely effective in filling Britain’s resource needs and feeding their hungry aircraft factories.

Junkers Ju-87 aluminium shipment

British aircraft factory

Related Posts

Do carrier aircraft get washed after every flight to remove salt residue?

There were quite a few times when I was climbing into the jet, getting ready to launch off the pointy end, when the chief would tug on my…

If a U.S. Navy carrier battle group cannot defeat the Houthis in Yemen, how is it going to defeat China in the South China Sea?

A question barely answerable. Well, if a US Navy carrier battle group cannot defeat the Houthis in Yemen, how is it going to defeat, what, oh, Cuba in…

Is it true that nuclear submarines carry some gold, firearms, and antibiotics in a vault to enable crewmen to survive a nuclear apocalypse?

I served on two nuclear submarines during the Cold War. We did carry gold, firearm, and antibiotics. They weren’t in a vault, though. The gold was carried, or…

President Trump said that the British should give the Argentinians the Falklands because the USA is not going to protect the British from the Argentinians any longer. How long will it be before the British surrender to the Argentinians?

I see no evidence that Trump has said anything about the Falklands lately, let alone the laughable claim in the question. As it is, the US is not…

If North Korea fires an ICBM at the USA, how many minutes will it take to reach U.S. mainland? Within how many seconds will the U.S. detect it?

Any ballistic missile fired from the DPRK would be detected almost immediately by either US radar systems in South Korea, naval vessels in the Sea of Japan or…

Is it really true that there are 2 F-16s waiting with their engines running in case something violates the Washington, D.C., no fly zone?

There are F-16, F-15 and F-35 fighter jets sitting alert 24/7 guarding all the borders of the US. And yes alert jets are near Washington D.C. They don’t…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *