Knowledge

How do submarines handle medical emergencies like a ruptured appendix when they’re deep underwater or in remote locations?

Approximately 1973, a USS Will Rodgers (SSBN 659B) crewman had a ruptured appendix roughly midway thought our patrol. The mission was a nuclear deterrent patrol, meaning 3 months underwater remaining undetected awaiting a coded war message to launch missiles.

My prior patrol had a LCDR MD aboard as part of the crew. The practice of having a MD aboard a SSBN was being curtailed at the time because the Navy had insufficient numbers of officer MDs to be assigned to every SSBN on patrol.

This patrol had only one Navy corpsman on board. The corpsman was not trained for surgery nor was he a “hot runner” (in general, not that swift and his hands shook during a trial surgery). The corpsman had read his manual and prepared for an emergency appendectomy as best he could but clearly was not up to the task.

Our limited supply of antibiotics had kept the sailor’s infection under control but were almost exhausted. Since medical treatment was essential in a life-threatening situation, the CO broke radio silence to send a burst transmission to SUBLANT for instructions on what to do.

The international threat assessment in 1973 was not severe and the powers that be decided to arrange a helicopter rendezvous to take the sick sailor ashore for medical treatment. After checking for no ships nearby, we surfaced at the time and location mandated (open sea), met the chopper and had the sailor hoisted off the deck. Ten minutes or so later, we dove and continued our patrol to the end.

My personal view is that the CO was justified, and the mission was not jeopardized. The sick sailor was saved and rejoined the crew during our next shore rotation. In wartime and national emergency, the outcome might have been different.

But I believe this was the right outcome and the officers involved made the correct decision under our circumstances, resulting in a life saved. I’d probably decide differently if the sailor had died before he could be transferred. Since we could not act to save a life, I believe the mission came first despite the impact on the dead sailor’s family from a delayed report of death.

Since cold storage was available, the mission could continue without interruption or possible SSBN location disclosure to an enemy. Fortunately, the crew is relatively healthy and young. Life-threatening incidents are relatively rare.

Related Posts

If an astronaut working on the International Space Station were somehow cut loose from his tether, would he fall back to Earth or orbit around it?

If an astronaut outside the ISS has his or her tether broken, they do not fall to the Earth. Before the tether was broken, the astronaut was in orbit at…

Escape velocity is supposed to be 24,000 mph, but our rockets never achieve this speed. How does that work?

Imagine you are sitting on a skateboard at the bottom of your drive and you need to get to the top. You could push off your garage door…

Can humans live on the side of a tidally-locked planet where neither day nor night exist?

Humans with their technology developed on Earth could live on a tidally locked planet where neither day nor night exists. We used to think that such planets become…

How did NASA make the shuttle safer after Columbia?

The problem was not just the piece of foam that struck the wing, it was a failure of imagination — NASA had seen foam fall before and decided…

Why do US Air Force fighters like the F-22 and F-15 place the engines right next to each other while Russian fighters like Su-27 always have a gap between the engines?

The United States has this thing where we learn from our mistakes. One of those mistakes was spacing twin engines as far apart as we did in the…

Is Mars too small to have a permanent atmosphere?

No, it is not. It used to have a thick atmosphere, perhaps thicker than Earth’s. It had that atmosphere for a couple of billion years and had oceans….