Knowledge

Does NASA refuse to use a Hubble telescope to take pictures of the Moon rovers left behind previously?

Jacob Fox is completely correct.

The Hubble Space Telescope is not capable of taking pictures of the Apollo landing sites for 2 reasons:

  • It does not have (anywhere near) the resolution to do so (at its distance from the Moon, the smallest details it can resolve are 600 ft. in diameter)
  • The lit side of the Moon’s surface is generally too bright for Hubble’s sensitive cameras (Hubble can occasionally capture images in the shadowed transition region between the light and dark sides, and can capture images of the unilluminated surface)

As several others have written, lunar orbiters from several nations have captured images of the landing sites. Here is a nice picture of the Apollo 11 site from India’s Chadrayaan-2 orbiter:

And here’s the best picture I can find of a rover that was left behind.

The picture is of the Apollo 17 landing site, taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. The Rover is to the far right, labeled LRV:

The rover tracks are clearly visible to both ALSEP and SEP.


Let me tell you a nice story: shortly after NASA has landed people on the Moon, the Soviets have sent two unmanned rovers there: Lunokhod 1 in 1970 and Lunokhod 2 in 1973. This is what they looked like:

According to official data from the Soviet space agency, Lunokhod 1 travelled over 10 km and Lunokhod 2 almost 37 km on the Moon surface. They measured the distance travelled counting revolutions of an “extra wheel” dragged behind the rover (seen in the picture above). At that time there were no telescopes capable of seeing the rovers directly, so it was best measurement they had.

In 2013 high resolution photos of the Moon surface from the NASA LRO satellite were available. The resolution of those photos was good enough not only to locate the Luna 21 lander and the Lunokhod rover, but to see the actual wheel tracks and re-measure the distance travelled. This led to revising the distance upwards, to over 39 km, apparently the extra wheel was slipping occasionally and thus the original distance measurement was imprecise.

So, while as others said, the HST does not have sufficient resolution to see from the distance of Low Earth Orbit the actual rovers, we now have a telescope on the Lunar orbit, that has photographed the whole Moon and found all the landing sites and hardware left on the surface.

Related Posts

Why was the aircraft carrier USS America CV-66 almost impossible to sink when it was used as a test target in 2005 while battleships with much thicker armor were routinely sunk in combat in WW2 using now-obsolete weapons?

The USS America is the only super carrier ever sunk, either on purpose or in combat. It took four weeks and they ended up having to scuttle her…

Are there dead bodies in Titanic?

There are some preserved bodies inside the bowels of the wreckage. The engineers that were trapped in the bottom are believed to had been preserved as they’re buried…

Can China destroy the American Navy fleet if they get into Chinese waters?

China can destroy any fleet anywhere in the world. Not only an American one. Not only near and around China, but anywhere. The idea that China has the…

Is it true that USS Eisenhower (docked for repairs in Souda Bay) hit and severely damaged by multiple Houthi ballistic missiles?

Yes, the Eisenhower was sunk. Fortunately close NATO ally the United Kingdom stepped in to help – you see the Argentines managed to sink HMS Invincible three times…

If a planet is 500 light years away, does that mean that even if you traveled at the speed of light, it would still take you 500 years to get there?

In Special Relativity, we are concerned with different frames and how they compare with each other. So the short answer is you could do it in under 500…

How did the US transport hundreds of fighter planes to Europe during WWII? Did they have the range to fly that far?

In 1942, as the British readied airfields for them, B-17 bombers and P-38 twin engine fighters would self deploy from the US to England. Neither aircraft had the…

error: Content is protected !!