Knowledge

Aren’t AWACs very easy targets for enemy planes? Has this been tested in modern aerial warfare? They seem to be very slow planes.

A converted civilian airliner with huge radar on it flying a predictable racetrack pattern is pretty easy to shoot down—if you ever get in range.

The problem is, you’ll never get in range.

You’ll have to go through the gauntlet of fighters looking for targets, who are in all likeliness already know where you are and where you’re heading—because the AWACS told them.

Meanwhile, the AWACS itself is likely flying over another country.

Some people here has been saying “what about this missile or that technology?”

It still doesn’t change the answer. AWACS is very hard to get to even with long range missiles, stealth airplanes, and whatever else.

In wartime, AWACS is used in conjunction with hundreds, if not more than a thousand, other airplanes. Some of those airplanes will be hunting for stealth airplanes or even the airbase they operate from. An airplane that can’t take off is no different than an airplane that has been shot down. Chances are, in a war with NATO, you got far more immediate threats than the AWACS itself.

Also, if a missile can go very far, great. But can the radar pick up something that far though?

A radar is subject to inverse power of 4 law, 2 one way and 2 on return, so a radar that can pick up something more than 400 km away is very big and as about as stealthy as a bullhorn in an office meeting. A ground installation will be prime target for NATO airplanes and special forces the second the operation commences. Put it on an airplane and the airplane won’t be very stealthy.

If you can’t find the AWACS itself, how are you going to shoot the missiles?

Stealth doesn’t make you invisible; it makes you harder to detect, but at some point you’ll be detected. Turning on radar or transmitting using the radio will also make you susceptible to detection. You need to run through an entire NATO air campaign more or less by sight, also avoiding any ground or naval defenses for more than 400 km, and then, if you’re lucky, you might find the AWACS being escorted by fighter jets. And then you do it again in reverse to escape.

Keep in mind that NATO has more AWACS-type airplanes than non-NATO countries have operational stealth jets, so trying to trade 1-for-1 is a losing proposition.

It’s much easier to send in saboteurs to bomb the airplane on the ground or plant a traitor in the midst than doing that.

Related Posts

If an astronaut working on the International Space Station were somehow cut loose from his tether, would he fall back to Earth or orbit around it?

If an astronaut outside the ISS has his or her tether broken, they do not fall to the Earth. Before the tether was broken, the astronaut was in orbit at…

Escape velocity is supposed to be 24,000 mph, but our rockets never achieve this speed. How does that work?

Imagine you are sitting on a skateboard at the bottom of your drive and you need to get to the top. You could push off your garage door…

Can humans live on the side of a tidally-locked planet where neither day nor night exist?

Humans with their technology developed on Earth could live on a tidally locked planet where neither day nor night exists. We used to think that such planets become…

How did NASA make the shuttle safer after Columbia?

The problem was not just the piece of foam that struck the wing, it was a failure of imagination — NASA had seen foam fall before and decided…

Why do US Air Force fighters like the F-22 and F-15 place the engines right next to each other while Russian fighters like Su-27 always have a gap between the engines?

The United States has this thing where we learn from our mistakes. One of those mistakes was spacing twin engines as far apart as we did in the…

Is Mars too small to have a permanent atmosphere?

No, it is not. It used to have a thick atmosphere, perhaps thicker than Earth’s. It had that atmosphere for a couple of billion years and had oceans….