Knowledge

Are US Navy carrier strike group escorts expected to absorb a missile to keep it from hitting the aircraft carrier?

See this thing …

Yes, it’s a Naval helicopter.
Ardleigh Burke’s and Ticonderoga’s carry two each.

When they are not being used for ASW operations they roles include using their ECM suite to pretend to be the carrier itself.

I understand that 40 years ago, during the Falkland’s War, one of Prince Andrews’ jobs was to use his chopper’s ECM suite to mimic either HMS Hermes or HMS Invincible, or possibly both, in order to confuse any incoming radar guided Exocet missiles of what target the missiles were actually locked onto.
I imagine modern US Naval doctrine continues the use of helicopters in this role.

If the carrier’s destroyer / cruiser screen is laying smoke then the incoming missile will need to rely on radar guidance to hit the carrier. A helicopter can make a pretty convincing imitation of a carrier shielded by a smoke screen.

Then you have the CIWS of the carrier itself.

As well as placing themselves in harm’s way to intercept inbound anti-ship missiles, the escorts of a US carrier strike group are also required to position their vessel in the way of any wake homing torpedos fired towards the carrier. Not a pleasant job, but far better to loose an escort vessel and it’s crew than to have the carrier rendered combat ineffective.

As a missile was detected, the Electronic Warfare (EW) operators would activate their tools to appear attractive to the missiles. Meanwhile, the Gunners Mate Missiles (GMM) would begin tracking and engage with Standard Missile type I (SM1) missles, from the missile launcher on the forecastle.

If the GMMs fail, the Gunners Mate Guns (GMG) would then engage with the 76mm gun mounted amidships on the top deck.

If the gun fails to blow up the incoming missile, the GMGs would engage the Close In Weapons System (CIWS), otherwise known as R2D2 with a hard on.

If all the above fails, blow chaff and pray the missile misses the ship and falls into the ocean somewhere nearby.

Two Perry Class Frigates have taken modern combat damage and survived.

The Stark

Took two Iraqi Exocet anti-ship missiles under the bridge in May of 1987. A total of thirty-seven United States Navy personnel were killed or later died as a result of the attack, and twenty-one were injured. Decommissioned on 7 May 1999, Stark was scrapped in 2006

And the Samuel B. Roberts

It was severely damaged by an Iranian mine in 1988, leading U.S. forces to respond with Operation Praying Mantis. Repaired and returned to duty, the ship served until decommissioned in 2015.

Related Posts

Why are the 747-8 engines placed differently than on the older versions?

In older aircraft the engines were hung on pylons that extended downwards. It was designed like that for a reason. If you were to place the engines too…

Why was the aircraft carrier USS America CV-66 almost impossible to sink when it was used as a test target in 2005 while battleships with much thicker armor were routinely sunk in combat in WW2 using now-obsolete weapons?

The USS America is the only super carrier ever sunk, either on purpose or in combat. It took four weeks and they ended up having to scuttle her…

Are there dead bodies in Titanic?

There are some preserved bodies inside the bowels of the wreckage. The engineers that were trapped in the bottom are believed to had been preserved as they’re buried…

Can China destroy the American Navy fleet if they get into Chinese waters?

China can destroy any fleet anywhere in the world. Not only an American one. Not only near and around China, but anywhere. The idea that China has the…

Is it true that USS Eisenhower (docked for repairs in Souda Bay) hit and severely damaged by multiple Houthi ballistic missiles?

Yes, the Eisenhower was sunk. Fortunately close NATO ally the United Kingdom stepped in to help – you see the Argentines managed to sink HMS Invincible three times…

If a planet is 500 light years away, does that mean that even if you traveled at the speed of light, it would still take you 500 years to get there?

In Special Relativity, we are concerned with different frames and how they compare with each other. So the short answer is you could do it in under 500…

error: Content is protected !!