Knowledge

Why is USB-C necessary when the previous USB was adequate to accomplish everyday tasks?

Well, the prior USB cable types really weren’t adequate.

First, USB-A was just too big. And one end of basically everything required it. That’s not ideal. USB-C allows not only a cord that where which end didn’t matter, but also where orientation doesn’t matter. USB-A (and all prior USB standards) required a specific orientation, which is annoying for regular use.

Second, USB-A was never designed for high numbers of connect-disconnect cycles.

Early USB devices were things like printers, modems, keyboards and mice. They were typically left plugged in all the time. As we got things like smartphones, disconnect cycles went way up, and caused issues with connectors. USB-C is deigned to be connected and disconnected a lot more.

Third, USB-A is also power limited for many applications, and was never designed for the sorts of power needs that a fast recharge on a modern phone requires.

Fourth, it’s really not fast enough. USB is (more or less) limited to 480Mbits/s. That’s well under the speeds of modern networking standards, to say nothing of things like SSD drives or hi-def video needs.

USB had an amazing run as the standard port, replacing all sorts of other ports that were common on PC’s before the mid-1990’s. But it’s time is done, and the replacement of prior standards with USB 3.2 and USB-C is a huge step forward that will make everyone’s lives better.

Actually, I have to admit that USB-C is better in almost every way to older USB standards.

When the EU told Apple they had to have USB-C connections on phones, I was pretty cynical. These types of things never work:

EU formally adopts law requiring Apple to support USB-C chargers | CNN Business

But, I was wrong. Forcing everyone to move to USB-C has been amazingly good for consumers. I am now a USB-C convert and I pretty much won’t buy your product if it doesn’t support USB-C these days.

The connector is universal (goes in either way) and supports higher data rates and higher wattage power supply. It’s also acceptably small.

All in all, an amazingly good industry standard.

Related Posts

Why was the aircraft carrier USS America CV-66 almost impossible to sink when it was used as a test target in 2005 while battleships with much thicker armor were routinely sunk in combat in WW2 using now-obsolete weapons?

The USS America is the only super carrier ever sunk, either on purpose or in combat. It took four weeks and they ended up having to scuttle her…

Are there dead bodies in Titanic?

There are some preserved bodies inside the bowels of the wreckage. The engineers that were trapped in the bottom are believed to had been preserved as they’re buried…

Can China destroy the American Navy fleet if they get into Chinese waters?

China can destroy any fleet anywhere in the world. Not only an American one. Not only near and around China, but anywhere. The idea that China has the…

Is it true that USS Eisenhower (docked for repairs in Souda Bay) hit and severely damaged by multiple Houthi ballistic missiles?

Yes, the Eisenhower was sunk. Fortunately close NATO ally the United Kingdom stepped in to help – you see the Argentines managed to sink HMS Invincible three times…

If a planet is 500 light years away, does that mean that even if you traveled at the speed of light, it would still take you 500 years to get there?

In Special Relativity, we are concerned with different frames and how they compare with each other. So the short answer is you could do it in under 500…

How did the US transport hundreds of fighter planes to Europe during WWII? Did they have the range to fly that far?

In 1942, as the British readied airfields for them, B-17 bombers and P-38 twin engine fighters would self deploy from the US to England. Neither aircraft had the…

error: Content is protected !!