Knowledge

If elephants were extinct, would we ever be able to figure out that they had trunks? Why or why not? What does this suggest about our current understanding of extinct organisms?

Elephants’ trunks are muscular hydrostats, which means they are made up of mostly muscle and have no bones or joints. An elephant’s trunk has over 40,000 muscles, which is much more than the entire human body:

This means that although trunks don’t fossilise, other evidence can help researchers determine that elephants had trunks. For example, researchers can study the structure of an elephant’s skull to infer that it had a trunk. Moreover, we have mammoth mummies with their trunks intact:

Scientists now believe that elephants’ trunks evolved from a snorkel-like structure that helped their semi-aquatic ancestors move underwater:

Eventually, the trunk became longer and more versatile, and evolved into the elephant’s trunk we see today.


We do not know what the dinosaurs looked like or how they acted. All we have to go on is there bones and occasionally a footprint or skin print, even the bones can be questionable as fragmants are found with little context on where they go. Scientists can only speculate, linking what they find to modurn creatures, hypothising what the creature was when it was alive.

But modern creatures it is a little different. We have so much literature, pictures, paintings statues and even the aural tradition. These well known and popular creatures could become extent but there is so much evidence of what they were even as they pass into legend.

A lot more than just the elephants would need to be lost before anyone would question what these bones. If all of that went and future humans, some sort of alien or what ever comes next after us comes along in 10,000 plus years and finds a fossil of an elephant and tasks themselves about learning about this creature then there is a chance they will not consider the animal had a trunk.

Maybe they would conclude something like this artist sketched up.

Related Posts

Why was the aircraft carrier USS America CV-66 almost impossible to sink when it was used as a test target in 2005 while battleships with much thicker armor were routinely sunk in combat in WW2 using now-obsolete weapons?

The USS America is the only super carrier ever sunk, either on purpose or in combat. It took four weeks and they ended up having to scuttle her…

Are there dead bodies in Titanic?

There are some preserved bodies inside the bowels of the wreckage. The engineers that were trapped in the bottom are believed to had been preserved as they’re buried…

Can China destroy the American Navy fleet if they get into Chinese waters?

China can destroy any fleet anywhere in the world. Not only an American one. Not only near and around China, but anywhere. The idea that China has the…

Is it true that USS Eisenhower (docked for repairs in Souda Bay) hit and severely damaged by multiple Houthi ballistic missiles?

Yes, the Eisenhower was sunk. Fortunately close NATO ally the United Kingdom stepped in to help – you see the Argentines managed to sink HMS Invincible three times…

If a planet is 500 light years away, does that mean that even if you traveled at the speed of light, it would still take you 500 years to get there?

In Special Relativity, we are concerned with different frames and how they compare with each other. So the short answer is you could do it in under 500…

How did the US transport hundreds of fighter planes to Europe during WWII? Did they have the range to fly that far?

In 1942, as the British readied airfields for them, B-17 bombers and P-38 twin engine fighters would self deploy from the US to England. Neither aircraft had the…

error: Content is protected !!